<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lost on the Shore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostontheshore.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostontheshore.com</link>
	<description>a blog from the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tilting at Windmills by tom</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2012/01/14/tilting-at-windmills/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=444#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>Yes.  I believe the turbines proposed for the Maryland shore will be barely visible from the beach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  I believe the turbines proposed for the Maryland shore will be barely visible from the beach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tilting at Windmills by Jim</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2012/01/14/tilting-at-windmills/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=444#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>This photo shows turbines 1.6 miles offshore. I think the Maryland and Delaware turbines will be 12 miles offshore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photo shows turbines 1.6 miles offshore. I think the Maryland and Delaware turbines will be 12 miles offshore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time To Go by tom</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2011/01/05/time-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=411#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Hi John, and thanks for your comment.  You make some good points, but I have to respond to a couple of them.

First of all, it doesn&#039;t seem to me that the LCB has done a good job of regulating commerce in liquor at all.  As you point out, there is already a problem of rowdy, drunken behavior in Ocean City; having the LCB doesn&#039;t seem to have affected that.  The LCB is not really a regulatory agency at all, they simply serve as a wholesaler of spirits (and to some extent wine).  One of the interesting things about Worcester County is the existence of private retailers of spirits along with the LCB-owned stores.  How do the lucky few get permission to retail spirits in competition withe the LCB?  Apparently they know someone.

I agree that an ineffective management wouldn&#039;t be a sufficient reason to dismantle the LCB, but I have no illusions that suddenly they are going to get rid of the current management and install competent, experienced management.  There has been no indication that the board members are dissatisfied with the current management and, if they were, there is no indication that they would then look for person highly-skilled and competent in the liquor wholesaling business.  They&#039;ll just find another friend.  Indeed, from the statements they&#039;ve made, the LCB members don&#039;t seem to think they&#039;ve done anything wrong.

If the elimination of the LCB were accompanied by significant increases in licensing fees, the county and municipalities would receive the same amount of revenue while eliminating a source of inefficiency and incompetence in our county.  Plenty of other counties...Anne Arundel, Howard, Talbot, Frederick, Baltimore, Harford...seem to do just fine without a Liquor Control Board.  It&#039;s time for them to go.

-Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, and thanks for your comment.  You make some good points, but I have to respond to a couple of them.</p>
<p>First of all, it doesn&#8217;t seem to me that the LCB has done a good job of regulating commerce in liquor at all.  As you point out, there is already a problem of rowdy, drunken behavior in Ocean City; having the LCB doesn&#8217;t seem to have affected that.  The LCB is not really a regulatory agency at all, they simply serve as a wholesaler of spirits (and to some extent wine).  One of the interesting things about Worcester County is the existence of private retailers of spirits along with the LCB-owned stores.  How do the lucky few get permission to retail spirits in competition withe the LCB?  Apparently they know someone.</p>
<p>I agree that an ineffective management wouldn&#8217;t be a sufficient reason to dismantle the LCB, but I have no illusions that suddenly they are going to get rid of the current management and install competent, experienced management.  There has been no indication that the board members are dissatisfied with the current management and, if they were, there is no indication that they would then look for person highly-skilled and competent in the liquor wholesaling business.  They&#8217;ll just find another friend.  Indeed, from the statements they&#8217;ve made, the LCB members don&#8217;t seem to think they&#8217;ve done anything wrong.</p>
<p>If the elimination of the LCB were accompanied by significant increases in licensing fees, the county and municipalities would receive the same amount of revenue while eliminating a source of inefficiency and incompetence in our county.  Plenty of other counties&#8230;Anne Arundel, Howard, Talbot, Frederick, Baltimore, Harford&#8230;seem to do just fine without a Liquor Control Board.  It&#8217;s time for them to go.</p>
<p>-Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time To Go by John Hayden</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2011/01/05/time-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=411#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom -- Anachronistic? The Liquor Control Board is an unusual arrangement. But then, the liquor business is an unusual business. In fact, quite a few regulatory structures that were introduced in the 1930s have proven to be quite useful. A few of those regulatory institutions (banking comes to mind) have been cut back in recent years, with unfortunate results.

The Liquor Control Board has worked pretty well over the years, both moderating commerce in liquor and returning significant revenue to Worcester County.

I agree with you that the management of the LCB is &quot;ineffective, at best.&quot; But ineffective management is not a sufficient reason to dismantle a useful agency. The obvious solution is to simply fix the management problems.

Also worth considering: 1) Worcester County is not alone in bucking the trend to eliminating all regulations on business, including the liquor business. All three counties on the Lower Shore have the same LCB system, and we might hesitate to break with Somerset and Wicomico on liquor control.

2) In addition to the three small Lower Shore Counties, the LCB system is also the system of preference by the largest jurisdiction in Maryland, Montgomery County.

3) The major beneficiaries of eliminating the LCB would be the Baltimore wholesalers and the Ocean City bar owners, not the people of Worcester County. Rowdy, drunken behavior is already a problem in Ocean City; liberalizing the liquor business would not improve the family atmosphere in OC.

4) For an example of serious problems in Maryland counties that don&#039;t have a LCB, check out the alleged scandal in Prince George&#039;s County regarding the Tick Tock bar and the outgoing county executive.

-- John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom &#8212; Anachronistic? The Liquor Control Board is an unusual arrangement. But then, the liquor business is an unusual business. In fact, quite a few regulatory structures that were introduced in the 1930s have proven to be quite useful. A few of those regulatory institutions (banking comes to mind) have been cut back in recent years, with unfortunate results.</p>
<p>The Liquor Control Board has worked pretty well over the years, both moderating commerce in liquor and returning significant revenue to Worcester County.</p>
<p>I agree with you that the management of the LCB is &#8220;ineffective, at best.&#8221; But ineffective management is not a sufficient reason to dismantle a useful agency. The obvious solution is to simply fix the management problems.</p>
<p>Also worth considering: 1) Worcester County is not alone in bucking the trend to eliminating all regulations on business, including the liquor business. All three counties on the Lower Shore have the same LCB system, and we might hesitate to break with Somerset and Wicomico on liquor control.</p>
<p>2) In addition to the three small Lower Shore Counties, the LCB system is also the system of preference by the largest jurisdiction in Maryland, Montgomery County.</p>
<p>3) The major beneficiaries of eliminating the LCB would be the Baltimore wholesalers and the Ocean City bar owners, not the people of Worcester County. Rowdy, drunken behavior is already a problem in Ocean City; liberalizing the liquor business would not improve the family atmosphere in OC.</p>
<p>4) For an example of serious problems in Maryland counties that don&#8217;t have a LCB, check out the alleged scandal in Prince George&#8217;s County regarding the Tick Tock bar and the outgoing county executive.</p>
<p>&#8211; John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tea &#8220;Party&#8221; by John Doe</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2010/04/25/tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=349#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Did you know that the first Tea Party, even before the famous Boston Tea Party, was held in the harbor of Chestertown Maryland, right here on the Eastern Shore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the first Tea Party, even before the famous Boston Tea Party, was held in the harbor of Chestertown Maryland, right here on the Eastern Shore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Losing our Lead by Dennis Carraway</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2010/04/07/losing-our-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Carraway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=338#comment-236</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now the position is reversed.  China will be providing the technology and the engineering; we’ll be providing the labor.  It’s a sad state of affairs.&quot;

why is that sad? do you think the Chinese were sad when they had to go into dirty old shit mines carrying barrels of dynamite only to be blown up while they were still inside? no, they were probably happy to be mostly free and to have opportunities. they took advantage of what they had and were probably thankful to have anything at all. clearly the Americans did not and that&#039;s why the situation is reversed. It&#039;s unfortunate that people in this country might actually have to work for things but the chinks and nearly every other country has done it for centuries so it&#039;s not as bad as it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now the position is reversed.  China will be providing the technology and the engineering; we’ll be providing the labor.  It’s a sad state of affairs.&#8221;</p>
<p>why is that sad? do you think the Chinese were sad when they had to go into dirty old shit mines carrying barrels of dynamite only to be blown up while they were still inside? no, they were probably happy to be mostly free and to have opportunities. they took advantage of what they had and were probably thankful to have anything at all. clearly the Americans did not and that&#8217;s why the situation is reversed. It&#8217;s unfortunate that people in this country might actually have to work for things but the chinks and nearly every other country has done it for centuries so it&#8217;s not as bad as it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are They Lost in the Desert? by John Hayden</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2010/04/06/are-they-lost-in-the-desert/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=334#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Excellent post! Thanks for your in-depth coverage of the health care issue.

 My concern now is that President Obama has used up all his political capital on health care. Unless Democrats like Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin are willing to use some of their own political capital to support the president&#039;s other proposals, I&#039;m afraid we&#039;ll have gridlock until November. I&#039;m thinking about President Obama&#039;s jobs program, Wall Street reform program, and energy program. I understand that offshore drilling is a sensitive issue, but I was disheartened by Sen. Mikulski and Sen. Cardin&#039;s rush to distance themselves from Obama&#039;s initiative on offshore drilling. This kind of &quot;support&quot; from leading Democrats is disappointing. Realistically speaking, we are not going to be able to pass a purely &quot;green&quot; energy package without at least a nod to either petroleum or coal, or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post! Thanks for your in-depth coverage of the health care issue.</p>
<p> My concern now is that President Obama has used up all his political capital on health care. Unless Democrats like Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin are willing to use some of their own political capital to support the president&#8217;s other proposals, I&#8217;m afraid we&#8217;ll have gridlock until November. I&#8217;m thinking about President Obama&#8217;s jobs program, Wall Street reform program, and energy program. I understand that offshore drilling is a sensitive issue, but I was disheartened by Sen. Mikulski and Sen. Cardin&#8217;s rush to distance themselves from Obama&#8217;s initiative on offshore drilling. This kind of &#8220;support&#8221; from leading Democrats is disappointing. Realistically speaking, we are not going to be able to pass a purely &#8220;green&#8221; energy package without at least a nod to either petroleum or coal, or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wonderful Economic News! by dusan</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2010/03/12/wonderful-economic-news/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>dusan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=305#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Well said. I&#039;m from the UK but we have the same ever-yawning chasm between rich and poor, with little appetite from any political party to do anything about it (redistribution? taxation? these are all taboo). I liked the Spirit Level book for pointing out that it&#039;s even in the filthy rich&#039;s collective self interest to do something about it. Any ideas what&#039;s to be done to change things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I&#8217;m from the UK but we have the same ever-yawning chasm between rich and poor, with little appetite from any political party to do anything about it (redistribution? taxation? these are all taboo). I liked the Spirit Level book for pointing out that it&#8217;s even in the filthy rich&#8217;s collective self interest to do something about it. Any ideas what&#8217;s to be done to change things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Depression Amidst the Fun by John Hayden</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2010/02/27/depression-amidst-the-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=281#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Good post. You&#039;ve opened a subject with lots to ponder, particularly in this time of painful economic change. Low wages and winter unemployment. That about sums it up for many Worcester County residents. Thank goodness for unemployment benefits in the winter, but they&#039;re not enough to live on. I don&#039;t know the answer to the jobs problem.

However, the low cost of housing in Worcester County, relative to the metro areas, is a plus. You can buy a nice house on the southern part of Maryland&#039;s Eastern Shore for $150,000 or less, if it&#039;s not waterfront. It&#039;s always been possible to rent at reasonable prices in Ocean City, West Ocean City and Berlin, if you can sign a year-round lease. With the condo market depressed, many owners are unable to sell and are seeking long-term renters. In other words, it&#039;s a renter&#039;s market.

Not only housing, but the cost of most everything is lower here. I can get a haircut for $8 in OC, gasoline is lower than in the cities, and car insurance is much cheaper. And the Ocean City and Showell elementary shools are excellent, so parents don&#039;t have to pay for private schools.

The reason I moved back to OC from Montgomery County is the low cost of living. I recommend year-round living in Worcester County to many folks who are struggling in the cities and suburbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. You&#8217;ve opened a subject with lots to ponder, particularly in this time of painful economic change. Low wages and winter unemployment. That about sums it up for many Worcester County residents. Thank goodness for unemployment benefits in the winter, but they&#8217;re not enough to live on. I don&#8217;t know the answer to the jobs problem.</p>
<p>However, the low cost of housing in Worcester County, relative to the metro areas, is a plus. You can buy a nice house on the southern part of Maryland&#8217;s Eastern Shore for $150,000 or less, if it&#8217;s not waterfront. It&#8217;s always been possible to rent at reasonable prices in Ocean City, West Ocean City and Berlin, if you can sign a year-round lease. With the condo market depressed, many owners are unable to sell and are seeking long-term renters. In other words, it&#8217;s a renter&#8217;s market.</p>
<p>Not only housing, but the cost of most everything is lower here. I can get a haircut for $8 in OC, gasoline is lower than in the cities, and car insurance is much cheaper. And the Ocean City and Showell elementary shools are excellent, so parents don&#8217;t have to pay for private schools.</p>
<p>The reason I moved back to OC from Montgomery County is the low cost of living. I recommend year-round living in Worcester County to many folks who are struggling in the cities and suburbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Threat to the Maryland Way of Life? by Anne</title>
		<link>http://lostontheshore.com/2010/02/25/a-threat-to-the-maryland-way-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostontheshore.com/?p=275#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Brilliant piece.  Good for MD, it&#039;s about time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant piece.  Good for MD, it&#8217;s about time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

